Breadcrumbs
Home > IBS Journal > News > More problem projects at Temenos14 January 2013
Two financial institutions, one in Kuwait and one in France, are believed to have stopped their implementations of Temenos' flagship, T24. Meanwhile, Banque Libano-Francaise (BLF) is yet to cut over to T24 and Oracle components, more than five years after the start of the project.
Add comment
Registered users can login (top right) to post comments instantly. You do not need to register to comment on this article, but doing so will give you access to additional content on this website and discounts on IBS research publications, please click here to register (it is free and only takes a minute). Comments are moderated and therefore may not show immediately. Check the Commenting Rules in our Terms and Conditions for more details.
Related articles
- CSC inks partnership with SAP for Hogan users upgrade path 23 May 2013
- Wipro lands first European deal for hosted T24 platform 22 May 2013
- Core Banking Systems Country Analysis: Western Europe Region – including A-Z sales tables 2007-2012 by country and system 13 May 2013
- Core Banking Systems Country Analysis: Middle East Region – including A-Z sales tables 2007-2012 by country and system 13 May 2013
- Case study: Home Trust Company – Back to the drawing board 07 May 2013
- On the move – May 2013 07 May 2013
- Who's Bought What? – May 2013 07 May 2013
- Nedbank moves towards core system decision 30 April 2013
- Bank Al Muamelat Assahiha in Mauritania goes live with iMAL 26 April 2013
- New core banking system deal for BML Istisharat 17 April 2013
- Capgemini reinvigorates partnership with SAP for SAP for Banking 09 April 2013
- Temenos: T24, Temenos Corebanking 05 April 2013
- Temenos: T24 – Part 3 (Partner Strategy to T24 User List and System Implementations by Region Pie Chart) 05 April 2013
- Temenos: T24 – Part 3 (Partner Strategy to T24 User List and System Implementations by Region Pie Chart) 05 April 2013
- Editor's Note – April 2013 04 April 2013
- On the move – April 2013 04 April 2013
- Who's Bought What? – April 2013 04 April 2013
- Case study: Banco Improsa – Great expectations 04 April 2013
- Case study: ABN Amro – Starting over 04 April 2013
- Case study: Finca – Flexible finc-ing 04 April 2013
- Analysis: Core banking systems market – Holding steady 03 April 2013
- Spotlight: Iran – Loss for some, gain for others 03 April 2013
- Country focus: Turkey – Turkish delight 03 April 2013
- SAB: SAB AT/Samic 02 April 2013
- Alaric secures first win in Indonesia 02 April 2013
Order IBS publications in our Research Shop
- Research Shop
- IBS Journal
- Banking Systems Market Survey 2012/13
- Back Office Systems Guide
- Banking Definitions Guide
- Core Banking Systems Cost Benchmark 2012
- Core Banking Systems Benchmark 2011
- Core Banking Systems Case Studies
- How To Select & Implement A Universal Banking System
- Islamic Banking Systems Guide
- Market Dynamics Report 2012
- Middle East Banking Systems
- Payments Systems Guide
- Retail Banking Systems
- Risk Management Systems Guide
- Treasury/Capital Markets Systems
- Wealth Management Systems























Comments
It would be more interesting to have a view on how recently signed projects are progressing, so as to get a more "balanced" view of the overall situation - i.e. whether Temenos is at last managing to start correcting its reputation in implementations or not.
What Mr. Jon is stating may be correct. But we should not forget the number of Banks T24 is being used continuously over decades. There may be varying reasons for problems in these three sites.
However, how come Temenos could withstand, for so long and most of the times as market leader and enjoying number one position, without any stuff in it's CBS?
Thank you for your comment. Please let me confirm that this story does NOT infer that Temenos systems are not reliable (if you had a subscription to read this article in full you will see this clearly) - projects fail for various reasons, and we do not imply that T24 is to blame. Temenos is also not the only supplier which experiences problem projects. Furthermore, suppliers are not necessarily to blame in many instances, with issues at other participants, including the banks themselves being part of the reason behind decisions to terminate. Since neither party provided us with a comment to clarify and explain their termination of the projects we only include in the story what we know (again, if you had a subscription to IBS Journal you would have the full story). Should more details arise we will update our readers accordingly.
Many thanks
Jon Raeside,
Marketing Manager, IBS Intelligence
The biggest mistake in my mind that all vendors and banks alike make is inadequate training - first of the implementation team and then of the end users.
Best Regards,
Cliff
Clifford G. Brody
Founder and Chief Executive Officer
Global Bankers Institute
Such incidence raise questions and impact potential clients. It is only fare that the vendor explain the reasons to them directly. We should not expect them to clarify these publically.
RSS feed for comments to this post